Model-backed features need both an API availability check and a runtime readiness decision. A deployment guard alone does not establish that a model is usable on the current device.
- 1SDK guard
- 2Runtime readiness
- 3Model session
- 4Useful fallback
Work through the example
Define the non-AI path first. Keep tool arguments validated and distinguish generated output from app-owned facts.
Start with a disposable branch and synthetic data. Write the expected outcome before changing the implementation, then keep the first failing result. This prevents a later repair from quietly redefining the task. The procedure below is grounded in the repository reference; its examples must still be checked against your project and installed toolchain.
Implementation reference
The following focused section is adapted from the maintained project guide. It preserves the source’s examples and limitations.
10. Availability
Two versions are in play. Do not collapse them.
// Baseline framework + on-device model.
@available(iOS 26.0, macOS 26.0, *)
// PCC model, Dynamic Profiles, image attachments, custom LanguageModel providers.
@available(iOS 27.0, *)
func makeSession() -> LanguageModelSession? {
if #available(iOS 27.0, *) {
return LanguageModelSession(profile: CookingProfile(state: state))
} else if #available(iOS 26.0, *) {
return LanguageModelSession(instructions: fallbackInstructions)
} else {
return nil // feature hidden entirely below iOS 26
}
}
An app supporting iOS 17+ (this skill's baseline) must treat every Foundation Models feature as additive. The non-AI path is the product; the AI path is an enhancement.
Acceptance and failure review
| Checkpoint | What to inspect | If it does not match |
|---|---|---|
| SDK guard | Confirm the input and environment | Preserve the failure and return to this step |
| Runtime readiness | Inspect the intermediate artifact | Preserve the failure and return to this step |
| Model session | Run the focused check | Preserve the failure and return to this step |
| Useful fallback | Record the observed result | Preserve the failure and return to this step |
Ask the agent to explain the smallest change that resolves the observed mismatch. Keep unrelated refactors out of the repair. A change that makes a warning disappear is not enough if the behavior or ownership contract has changed. Re-run the same acceptance check so the before and after results are comparable.
Evidence and limits
A simulator or static sample cannot establish every supported physical-device model configuration.
This is an educational guide. Its presence in the series does not certify a completed client-specific lab. The series evidence record separates executed checks from exercises and blocked environments.
Inspect the source used in this lesson.
Related reading
- How should I review availability guards when moving a Swift app toward iOS 27?
A measured guard-review example that separates SDK availability, runtime readiness, and static-analysis limits.
What to do next
Next: Notifications, background tasks and the permissions agents forget